Headlines: October Surprise: News Events that Influence the Outcome of the U.S. Presidential Election
Welcome to the month of October: Any surprise coming? #StayVigilant
Plus other News and Videos: Ain’t it better to be aware of what’s happening in your world!
- David Icke - Obama - The False Messiah...and a Free Phone!
- 1.4 BILLION Spent On The Obamas In 2012 – British Taxpayers Only Spent 57.8 Million On The Royal Family
- Clinton Admits Al Qaeda Behind Benghazi Attack
- Washington set to increase aid to Syrian insurgents, US official says
- US repeats nuclear bomb allegations against Iran
- 5-minute video: Declaration of Independence was/is lawful revolution from criminal government
- Revolution 2012: It's Time To Rise
October Surprise: News Events that Influence the Outcome of the U.S. Presidential Election
NOTE: Obviously we did not learn from 1980's video. In lieu, we embraced the Two-Party Plutocracy more! Ain't it great to be American Sheeple!
In American political jargon, an October surprise is a news event with the potential to influence the outcome of an election, particularly one for the U.S. presidency. The reference to the month of October is because the Tuesday after the first Monday in November is the date for national elections (as well as many state and local elections), and therefore events that take place in late October have greater potential to influence the decisions of prospective voters.
The term came into use shortly after the 1972 presidential election between Republican incumbent Richard Nixon and Democrat George McGovern, when the United States was in the fourth year of negotiations to end the very long and domestically divisive Vietnam War. Twelve days before the election day of November 7, on October 26, 1972, the United States' chief negotiator, the presidential National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, appeared at a press conference held at the White House and announced, "We believe that peace is at hand". [1] Nixon, despite having vowed to end the unpopular war during his presidential election campaign four years earlier, had failed to either cease hostilities or gradually bring about an end to the war. Nixon was nevertheless already widely considered to be assured of an easy reelection victory against McGovern, but Kissinger's "peace is at hand" declaration may have increased Nixon's already high standing with the electorate. In the event, Nixon outpolled McGovern in every state except Massachusetts and achieved a 20 point lead in the nationwide popular vote. The fighting ended in 1973, but soldiers remained in Vietnam until 1975.
Since that election, the term "October surprise" has been used preemptively during campaign season by partisans of one side to discredit late-campaign news by the other side.
During the Iran hostage crisis, the Republican challenger Ronald Reagan feared a last-minute deal to release the hostages, which might earn incumbent Jimmy Carter enough votes to win re-election in the 1980 presidential election. [2][3] As it happened, in the days prior to the election, press coverage was consumed with the Iranian government's decision—and Carter's simultaneous announcement—that the hostages would not be released until after the election. [3]
It was first written about in a Jack Anderson article in the Washington Post in the fall of 1980, in which he alleged that the Carter administration was preparing a major military operation in Iran for rescuing U.S. hostages in order to help him get reelected. Subsequent allegations surfaced against Reagan alleging that his team had impeded the hostage release to negate the potential boost to the Carter campaign.[4]
After the release of the hostages on January 20, 1981, literally twenty minutes following Reagan's inauguration, some charged that the Reagan campaign had made a secret deal with the Iranian government whereby the Iranians would hold the hostages until after Reagan was elected and inaugurated.[3]
Gary Sick, member of the National Security council under Presidents Ford and Carter (before being relieved of his duties mere weeks into Reagan's term)[5] made the accusation in a New York Times editorial[6] in the run-up to the 1992 election. The initial bipartisan response from Congress was skeptical: House Democrats refused to authorize an inquiry, and Senate Republicans denied a $600,000 appropriation for a probe.
Eight former hostages also sent an open letter demanding an inquiry in 1991.[6] In subsequent Congressional testimony, Sick said that the popular media had distorted and misrepresented the accusers, reducing them to "gross generalizations" and "generic conspiracy theorists." Sick penned a book on the subject and sold the movie rights to it for a reported $300,000.[7] His sources and thesis were contested by a number of commentators on both sides of the aisle. [8][9]
Bani-Sadr, the former President of Iran, has also stated "that the Reagan campaign struck a deal with Teheran to delay the release of the hostages in 1980," asserting that "by the month before the American Presidential election in November 1980, many in Iran's ruling circles were openly discussing the fact that a deal had been made between the Reagan campaign team and some Iranian religious leaders in which the hostages' release would be delayed until after the election so as to prevent President Carter's re-election"[10] He repeated the charge in "My Turn to Speak: Iran, the Revolution & Secret Deals with the U.S."[11][12]
Two separate congressional investigations looked into the charges, both concluding that there was no plan to seek to delay the hostages' release.[3] At least three books have argued the case.[13]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_surprise
October Surprise: News Events that Influence the Outcome of the U.S. Presidential Election
Welcome to the month of October: Any surprise coming? #StayVigilant
Plus other News and Videos: Ain’t it better to be aware of what’s happening in your world!
- David Icke - Obama - The False Messiah...and a Free Phone!
- 1.4 BILLION Spent On The Obamas In 2012 – British Taxpayers Only Spent 57.8 Million On The Royal Family
- Clinton Admits Al Qaeda Behind Benghazi Attack
- Washington set to increase aid to Syrian insurgents, US official says
- US repeats nuclear bomb allegations against Iran
- 5-minute video: Declaration of Independence was/is lawful revolution from criminal government
- Revolution 2012: It's Time To Rise
October Surprise: News Events that Influence the Outcome of the U.S. Presidential Election
NOTE: Obviously we did not learn from 1980's video. In lieu, we embraced the Two-Party Plutocracy more! Ain't it great to be American Sheeple!
In American political jargon, an October surprise is a news event with the potential to influence the outcome of an election, particularly one for the U.S. presidency. The reference to the month of October is because the Tuesday after the first Monday in November is the date for national elections (as well as many state and local elections), and therefore events that take place in late October have greater potential to influence the decisions of prospective voters.
The term came into use shortly after the 1972 presidential election between Republican incumbent Richard Nixon and Democrat George McGovern, when the United States was in the fourth year of negotiations to end the very long and domestically divisive Vietnam War. Twelve days before the election day of November 7, on October 26, 1972, the United States' chief negotiator, the presidential National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, appeared at a press conference held at the White House and announced, "We believe that peace is at hand". [1] Nixon, despite having vowed to end the unpopular war during his presidential election campaign four years earlier, had failed to either cease hostilities or gradually bring about an end to the war. Nixon was nevertheless already widely considered to be assured of an easy reelection victory against McGovern, but Kissinger's "peace is at hand" declaration may have increased Nixon's already high standing with the electorate. In the event, Nixon outpolled McGovern in every state except Massachusetts and achieved a 20 point lead in the nationwide popular vote. The fighting ended in 1973, but soldiers remained in Vietnam until 1975.
Since that election, the term "October surprise" has been used preemptively during campaign season by partisans of one side to discredit late-campaign news by the other side.
During the Iran hostage crisis, the Republican challenger Ronald Reagan feared a last-minute deal to release the hostages, which might earn incumbent Jimmy Carter enough votes to win re-election in the 1980 presidential election. [2][3] As it happened, in the days prior to the election, press coverage was consumed with the Iranian government's decision—and Carter's simultaneous announcement—that the hostages would not be released until after the election. [3]
It was first written about in a Jack Anderson article in the Washington Post in the fall of 1980, in which he alleged that the Carter administration was preparing a major military operation in Iran for rescuing U.S. hostages in order to help him get reelected. Subsequent allegations surfaced against Reagan alleging that his team had impeded the hostage release to negate the potential boost to the Carter campaign.[4]
After the release of the hostages on January 20, 1981, literally twenty minutes following Reagan's inauguration, some charged that the Reagan campaign had made a secret deal with the Iranian government whereby the Iranians would hold the hostages until after Reagan was elected and inaugurated.[3]
Gary Sick, member of the National Security council under Presidents Ford and Carter (before being relieved of his duties mere weeks into Reagan's term)[5] made the accusation in a New York Times editorial[6] in the run-up to the 1992 election. The initial bipartisan response from Congress was skeptical: House Democrats refused to authorize an inquiry, and Senate Republicans denied a $600,000 appropriation for a probe.
Eight former hostages also sent an open letter demanding an inquiry in 1991.[6] In subsequent Congressional testimony, Sick said that the popular media had distorted and misrepresented the accusers, reducing them to "gross generalizations" and "generic conspiracy theorists." Sick penned a book on the subject and sold the movie rights to it for a reported $300,000.[7] His sources and thesis were contested by a number of commentators on both sides of the aisle. [8][9]
Bani-Sadr, the former President of Iran, has also stated "that the Reagan campaign struck a deal with Teheran to delay the release of the hostages in 1980," asserting that "by the month before the American Presidential election in November 1980, many in Iran's ruling circles were openly discussing the fact that a deal had been made between the Reagan campaign team and some Iranian religious leaders in which the hostages' release would be delayed until after the election so as to prevent President Carter's re-election"[10] He repeated the charge in "My Turn to Speak: Iran, the Revolution & Secret Deals with the U.S."[11][12]
Two separate congressional investigations looked into the charges, both concluding that there was no plan to seek to delay the hostages' release.[3] At least three books have argued the case.[13]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_surprise
October Surprise: News Events that Influence the Outcome of the U.S. Presidential Election
David Icke - Obama - The False Messiah...and a Free Phone!
`Don`t vote...it only encourages them`
http://www.davidicke.com
http://www.infowars.com/
Song - GreenZilla - Height of Intermission
http://www.youtube.com/user/jeremy2k7
Trapped in a prism of snakes, cant get away,
though every single day try rememberin .watchin 911 on TV G watch the towers crumble 1 by 1 that really was our liberty
undone thing that the started of darkenest days
and a false messiah came into our life and now we cant
look away or run away but we try every single day we cannot shake
this mothafuckin false messiah, it coats the day like hot fire,
thrown up in ya face on the dollar bill replace the masonic seal
with the devils face!!
At the height of Intermission, truth became so suspicious. We didnt know what to do so we gathered with arms, in armageddeon fashion. And we ended up the dominant force, we realized, we were the dominant force mothafucka.
Strapped most of the nation head to teeth its a society
you cant see believe it tho its you and me, all the families pain collected
into one gamma ray, its like the lives that made mistakes and the
lives you took away. All corners of the USA including all 57 STATES, I heard
these mothafuckaz got alot to say.
now we cant
look away or run away yet we try every single day we cannot shake
this mothafuckin false messiah, it coats the day like hot fire,
thrown up in ya face on the dollar bill replace the masonic seal
with the devils face!!
At the height of Intermission, truth became so suspicious. We didnt know what to do so we gathered with arms, in armageddeon fashion. And we ended up the dominant force, we realized, we were the dominant force mothafucka.
David Icke - Obama - The False Messiah...and a Free Phone
`Don`t vote...it only encourages them`
http://www.davidicke.com
http://www.infowars.com/
Song - GreenZilla - Height of Intermission
http://www.youtube.com/user/jeremy2k7
Trapped in a prism of snakes, cant get away,
though every single day try rememberin .watchin 911 on TV G watch the towers crumble 1 by 1 that really was our liberty
undone thing that the started of darkenest days
and a false messiah came into our life and now we cant
look away or run away but we try every single day we cannot shake
this mothafuckin false messiah, it coats the day like hot fire,
thrown up in ya face on the dollar bill replace the masonic seal
with the devils face!!
At the height of Intermission, truth became so suspicious. We didnt know what to do so we gathered with arms, in armageddeon fashion. And we ended up the dominant force, we realized, we were the dominant force mothafucka.
Strapped most of the nation head to teeth its a society
you cant see believe it tho its you and me, all the families pain collected
into one gamma ray, its like the lives that made mistakes and the
lives you took away. All corners of the USA including all 57 STATES, I heard
these mothafuckaz got alot to say.
now we cant
look away or run away yet we try every single day we cannot shake
this mothafuckin false messiah, it coats the day like hot fire,
thrown up in ya face on the dollar bill replace the masonic seal
with the devils face!!
At the height of Intermission, truth became so suspicious. We didnt know what to do so we gathered with arms, in armageddeon fashion. And we ended up the dominant force, we realized, we were the dominant force mothafucka.
David Icke - Obama - The False Messiah...and a Free Phone
1.4 BILLION Spent On The Obamas In 2012 – British Taxpayers Only Spent 57.8 Million On The Royal Family
While most of America is suffering through one the worst economic downturns in U.S. history, the Obamas are living the high life at your expense. During 2011, U.S. taxpayers spent an astounding 1.4 billion dollars on the Obamas.
Meanwhile, British taxpayers only spent 57.8 million dollars on the entire royal family. Does anyone else see something wrong with this picture? So where did the 1.4 billion dollars go? That money paid the salaries of their staff members, it paid for their transportation and housing costs, it paid for entertainment and vacations for the Obamas, and $102,000 was even spent on a "dog handler" for the family dog Bo. In his new book entitled "Presidential Perks Gone Royal: Your Taxes Are Being Used For Obama's Re-election", author Robert Keith Gray reveals some absolutely shocking details about the enormous amounts of U.S. taxpayer money that are being spent on the personal needs of the Obamas. At a time when the U.S. national debt is absolutely exploding this kind of outrageous spending is completely and totally inappropriate, but of course the mainstream media is not going to report on this because they don't want to do anything to put the Obamas in a bad light this close to the election.
Sadly, the Obamas are not the only ones that are blowing U.S. taxpayer money as if there is no tomorrow.
In a previous article, I detailed how the U.S. Congress is also living the high life at your expense. The following are a few facts from that article....
-In 2010, the federal government spent $33,387 on the hair care needs of U.S. Senators.
-In 2010, U.S. Senators pulled $72,370 out of the "Senate Restaurant Fund".
-In 2010, U.S. Senators took $166,673 out of something called the "Senate Gift Shop Revolving Fund".
-In 2010, an average of $4,005,900 of U.S. taxpayer money was spent on "personal" and "office" expenses per Senator.
-Insider trading is 100% legal for members of Congress, and they refuse to pass a law that would change that.
Learn more here:
Clinton Admits Al Qaeda Behind Benghazi Attack
Please bear in mind that this happened on “September 11, 2012.” In other words, you gotta keep the “Fear Mongering” at all times. Well, you’ve been busted because the general public did not ‘buy’ your rotten plan.
As the US finally admits the murder of the US ambassador was an act of terrorism Hillary Clinton now suggests the attack was the work of Al Qaeda affiliated Salafi Jihadists.
From day one, the Obama administration was aware that the September 11 assault on the US consulate in Benghazi was a pre-planned terrorist attack, despite offering up conflicting explanations in the weeks since.
Unnamed officials confirm to Fox News that the White House knew that al-Qaeda-linked terrorists were behind the murder of four Americans in Libya, but only today did US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta publicly acknowledge the truth.
Secretary Panetta now admits that the Pentagon knew within hours of the assault on America’s Benghazi consulate that left Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others dead that it was an act of terrorism.
The Obama administration has altered their explanation repeatedly in the weeks since Mr. Stevens and three others were killed on September 11, 2012 while on assignment in Libya. On Thursday, the Defense Department confirmed the attack as having been hatched by terrorists, despite earlier statements made by the White House that suggested an anti-American film produced in the US had triggered a spontaneous assault.
Learn more here:
Washington set to increase aid to Syrian insurgents, US official says
A senior United States official has said Washington is set to unveil measures for increased assistance to armed groups in Syria.
The unnamed State Department official said in New York On Tuesday that the US assistance will not include weapons or ammunition, AFP reported.
"We've been clear about our assistance and the type of assistance we are providing and that is going to continue," the official said, after US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met UN-Arab League peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi.
Clinton will preside over the meeting of the so-called "Friends of Syria" group scheduled to be held on Friday.
Learn more here:
US repeats nuclear bomb allegations against Iran
US President Barack Obama has once again accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon and of failing to meet its international obligations.
He made the remarks at the Opening of the General Debate of the 67th Session of the United Nations General Assembly at the world body’s headquarters in New York on Tuesday.
Obama also said that Washington would prefer to resolve the dispute with Tehran over its nuclear energy program through diplomacy.
“America wants to resolve this issue through diplomacy, and we believe that there is still time and space to do so,” he said, adding that the United States and its allies will do everything they can “to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”
The US, Israel, and some of their allies accuse Iran of pursuing military objectives in its nuclear energy program.
Iran rejects the allegations, arguing that as a committed signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.
In addition, the IAEA has conducted numerous inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities but has never found any evidence showing that Iran's civilian nuclear program has been diverted to nuclear weapons production.
Source:
5-minute video: Declaration of Independence was/is lawful revolution from criminal government
The American Revolution only occurred a year after its own government attacked its own citizens under an unlawful standing army attempted to disarm its citizens at Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts. American leaders wrote and offered the “Olive Branch Petition” asking their government to restrain itself within its own laws and essentially forgiving its military-murders of American civilians.
Our government responded in 1775 by calling such Americans “traitors” with no retreat from their orders to arrest American leadership whose only “crime” was asking for lawful government.
That is history; this is today.
As always for today, we ask for peaceful, lawful response to what we allege in good faith as “emperor has no clothes” obvious crimes centering in war and money, and obfuscated by a 1% cartel/corporate media.
My only suggestion to the 99% is to let your heart and mind guide your beautiful, unique, and powerful self-expressions.
Learn more here:
Revolution 2012: It's Time To Rise
While most of America is suffering through one the worst economic downturns in U.S. history, the Obamas are living the high life at your expense. During 2011, U.S. taxpayers spent an astounding 1.4 billion dollars on the Obamas.
Meanwhile, British taxpayers only spent 57.8 million dollars on the entire royal family. Does anyone else see something wrong with this picture? So where did the 1.4 billion dollars go? That money paid the salaries of their staff members, it paid for their transportation and housing costs, it paid for entertainment and vacations for the Obamas, and $102,000 was even spent on a "dog handler" for the family dog Bo. In his new book entitled "Presidential Perks Gone Royal: Your Taxes Are Being Used For Obama's Re-election", author Robert Keith Gray reveals some absolutely shocking details about the enormous amounts of U.S. taxpayer money that are being spent on the personal needs of the Obamas. At a time when the U.S. national debt is absolutely exploding this kind of outrageous spending is completely and totally inappropriate, but of course the mainstream media is not going to report on this because they don't want to do anything to put the Obamas in a bad light this close to the election.
Sadly, the Obamas are not the only ones that are blowing U.S. taxpayer money as if there is no tomorrow.
In a previous article, I detailed how the U.S. Congress is also living the high life at your expense. The following are a few facts from that article....
-In 2010, the federal government spent $33,387 on the hair care needs of U.S. Senators.
-In 2010, U.S. Senators pulled $72,370 out of the "Senate Restaurant Fund".
-In 2010, U.S. Senators took $166,673 out of something called the "Senate Gift Shop Revolving Fund".
-In 2010, an average of $4,005,900 of U.S. taxpayer money was spent on "personal" and "office" expenses per Senator.
-Insider trading is 100% legal for members of Congress, and they refuse to pass a law that would change that.
Learn more here:
Clinton Admits Al Qaeda Behind Benghazi Attack
Please bear in mind that this happened on “September 11, 2012.” In other words, you gotta keep the “Fear Mongering” at all times. Well, you’ve been busted because the general public did not ‘buy’ your rotten plan.
As the US finally admits the murder of the US ambassador was an act of terrorism Hillary Clinton now suggests the attack was the work of Al Qaeda affiliated Salafi Jihadists.
From day one, the Obama administration was aware that the September 11 assault on the US consulate in Benghazi was a pre-planned terrorist attack, despite offering up conflicting explanations in the weeks since.
Unnamed officials confirm to Fox News that the White House knew that al-Qaeda-linked terrorists were behind the murder of four Americans in Libya, but only today did US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta publicly acknowledge the truth.
Secretary Panetta now admits that the Pentagon knew within hours of the assault on America’s Benghazi consulate that left Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others dead that it was an act of terrorism.
The Obama administration has altered their explanation repeatedly in the weeks since Mr. Stevens and three others were killed on September 11, 2012 while on assignment in Libya. On Thursday, the Defense Department confirmed the attack as having been hatched by terrorists, despite earlier statements made by the White House that suggested an anti-American film produced in the US had triggered a spontaneous assault.
Learn more here:
Washington set to increase aid to Syrian insurgents, US official says
A senior United States official has said Washington is set to unveil measures for increased assistance to armed groups in Syria.
The unnamed State Department official said in New York On Tuesday that the US assistance will not include weapons or ammunition, AFP reported.
"We've been clear about our assistance and the type of assistance we are providing and that is going to continue," the official said, after US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met UN-Arab League peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi.
Clinton will preside over the meeting of the so-called "Friends of Syria" group scheduled to be held on Friday.
Learn more here:
US repeats nuclear bomb allegations against Iran
US President Barack Obama has once again accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon and of failing to meet its international obligations.
He made the remarks at the Opening of the General Debate of the 67th Session of the United Nations General Assembly at the world body’s headquarters in New York on Tuesday.
Obama also said that Washington would prefer to resolve the dispute with Tehran over its nuclear energy program through diplomacy.
“America wants to resolve this issue through diplomacy, and we believe that there is still time and space to do so,” he said, adding that the United States and its allies will do everything they can “to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”
The US, Israel, and some of their allies accuse Iran of pursuing military objectives in its nuclear energy program.
Iran rejects the allegations, arguing that as a committed signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.
In addition, the IAEA has conducted numerous inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities but has never found any evidence showing that Iran's civilian nuclear program has been diverted to nuclear weapons production.
Source:
5-minute video: Declaration of Independence was/is lawful revolution from criminal government
The American Revolution only occurred a year after its own government attacked its own citizens under an unlawful standing army attempted to disarm its citizens at Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts. American leaders wrote and offered the “Olive Branch Petition” asking their government to restrain itself within its own laws and essentially forgiving its military-murders of American civilians.
Our government responded in 1775 by calling such Americans “traitors” with no retreat from their orders to arrest American leadership whose only “crime” was asking for lawful government.
That is history; this is today.
As always for today, we ask for peaceful, lawful response to what we allege in good faith as “emperor has no clothes” obvious crimes centering in war and money, and obfuscated by a 1% cartel/corporate media.
My only suggestion to the 99% is to let your heart and mind guide your beautiful, unique, and powerful self-expressions.
Learn more here:
Revolution 2012: It's Time To Rise
RSS Feed